Unpacking Bias…..!

AVOIDBIAS-672x300

In the May issue of the Harvard Business Review (HBR) the focus was on “Making Better Decisions; How to outsmart your biases and broaden your thinking”.  While this issue refers to more than just our biases based on race, ethnicity, sexual orientation and disability, the concepts of bias it addresses are very important to the legal profession.  In one article by John Beshears and Francesca Gino called “Leaders as Decision Architects” they address the two main causes of poor decision making: insufficient motivation and cognitive biases.”  This really struck a chord with me because I see this play out in the legal workplace all the time!

Lawyers are taught in law school to be objective, which is important.  However, science shows us that we all have biases which we bring into all that we do and all the decisions we make.  And lawyers are no different.

In the article listed above the authors address common biases that affect business decision making.  The biases below also impact lawyers in their business decision making and we are seeing this impact the practice of law more now than ever…

1) Action Oriented Biases – Excessive Optimism ( not our issue!!) and Overconfidence ( definitely our issue)!

2) Biases related to perceiving and judging alternatives – confirmation bias, anchoring and insufficient bias adjustment groupthink and egocentrism.

All of these are present in the legal profession, probably more so than other professions based on what we do. These are the types of biases that make Diversity and Inclusion work so difficult.  It is not just individual bias that keeps law firm Diversity and Inclusion efforts at bay, it is the collective cultural biases that affect advancement and retention efforts as well.

3) Biases related to the framing of alternatives – loss aversion, sunk-cost fallacy, escalation of commitment, controllability bias.

All of these biases play out very clearly in the legal profession and particularly in private practice.  Often times we are so risk averse it ends up costing us or our clients money.  We believe or try to convey a belief that things are more under control than they are!  Clients get this and honestly, they are looking for advice and counsel in all avenues and not just being the NO person!

 4) Stability Biases – status quo bias and present bias! These two biases are highly prevalent in the work I do! Preferring the status quo in the absence of pressure to change it and valuing immediate  rewards  and underlying long term gains.

So what do we do about this?  First be conscious and then be open to addressing these.  They affect not only Diversity and Inclusion efforts but how you do business as well!

suggested posts



TCDIP Statement Regarding George Floyd

We write to you with heavy hearts. Words are inadequate to capture the loss, despair, and anger so many of us are feeling following the senseless and tragic death of George Floyd. Our Twin Cities community and the nation are mourning, and we grieve for him and his family. May he rest in power.  George…keep reading

From Our Outgoing Board Members: Kathy Noecker

We’ve asked our outgoing Board Members to share their reflections about TCDIP’s impact on their careers and organizations. Kathy Noecker has served as a Board Member and most recently as our Board Co-Chair. Our deepest gratitude to Kathy for her commitment to TCDIP’s mission to attract, recruit, advance, and retain attorneys of color. What have…keep reading

From our Outgoing Board Members: Jeanine Lee

We’ve asked our outgoing Board Members to share their reflections about TCDIP’s impact on their careers and organizations. Our first post is from Jeanine Lee, who retired from Stinson LLP at the end of 2019. Many thanks to Jeanine for her years of service on our board, and her dedication to our mission to attract,…keep reading

TCDIP Blog